tisdag 26 juli 2011

Attack Reignites Immigration Debate in Divided Oslo

TERRORDÅDEN Mer insiktsfulla analyser från utlandet, denna gång signerat Steven Erlanger i The New York Times. PI har tidigare återgivit liknande artiklar från The Jerusalem Post och BBC News.

Norway has recently tightened its liberal immigration and asylum rules in the midst of a longstanding debate about assimilation and multiculturalism. Despite Norway's oil wealth and low unemployment, there has been a growing concern over the increasing size of the Muslim population, especially after Sept. 11 and the Danish crisis over the publication in late 2005 of cartoons depicting Muhammad, which were published in Norway, too.

But the Muslim population is growing, and Islam is now the country's second-largest religion. The impact of an increasing, and increasingly visible, Muslim population in a relatively monoethnic, liberal and egalitarian Norway has led to a surge in popularity for the anti-immigration Progress Party, now the second-largest party in Parliament. And it appears to have been one of the triggers to the massacre carried out here on Norway's white elite. The suspect, Anders Behring Breivik, claims he was compelled to act by the failure of mainstream politicians — including those in the Progress Party — to stem the Islamic tide.


But Norway's immigrant numbers nearly tripled between 1995 and 2010, and Muslims here, as elsewhere in Europe, tend to have larger families than the indigenous population.

And whether through simple economics, or the desire to live with other Muslims, or because of flawed social welfare policies, some cities have heavily migrant, informal ghettos that block easy assimilation into Norwegian language, culture and society.

In Furuset, a district nearly at the eastern end of Oslo's subway lines, immigrants outnumber native Norwegians, who are fleeing the area. A large new mosque is next to a community center up a small hill above the subway station, which is surrounded by a little park and benches. The park features a crude statue of Trygve Lie, the former foreign minister in exile during World War II who became the first secretary general of the United Nations, a symbol both of Norwegian resistance and of its embrace of international responsibility.

"When I moved here in 1976, it was a new area and there were only Norwegian people," said Lisbeth Norloff, a teacher of Norwegian. "And now, there are very few, and some of them are leaving." She's glad her own children are grown now and live elsewhere, she said, "so I don't have to worry about what to do myself."

In her classes in Furuset, she said, she has only two indigenous Norwegians out of 40 students, and she has had to lower the teaching standards, since many of her students do not speak Norwegian at home. "I think both sides are losing," she said.

"Here in Oslo there are a lot of schools now where the majority of students are not coming from Norwegian-speaking families," said Harald Stanghelle, the political editor of the newspaper Aftenposten. "It's a new phenomenon in Norway, and it has raised a new kind of debate."


A member of the Progress Party who did not want politics to intrude on national mourning and solidarity asked for anonymity. But he said there is more consensus now in Norway on a tougher, more restrictive policy. "Our immigration policies have been extremely naïve and our integration policies ditto, but that is something all our political parties now recognize," he said.

In the past, any criticism of immigration or asylum was considered racist, "but that has largely been repaired by now," he said. "We're having a real debate on immigration and integration and an election every four years. We are a country of consensus, this is Norway, and we're together in this," he said.

Arne Strand, the former political editor of the paper Dagsavisen, sees Mr. Breivik as a "lone rider," whose jumbled manifesto is unrepresentative of any real strain of thought in Norway, except a tiny fringe right. But as much as Norwegians hate the idea, he thinks the massacre will have some impact on politics. "This attack, this mass murder will bring this debate up again, and there are local elections next month," he said.

The New York Times


Källa: Politiskt Inkorrekt